Sunday, February 2, 2020

The 2 Worst Questions To, Ever, Register, Fully

WARNING: The article you are about to read may ruin your life, forever. If you are not delusion enough, you should avoid this article, while you, still, can. Lacking in delusion involves registering reality as reality, and not a warpage from emotions. Some realities are best avoided.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Question 1: "And, then, what !?"

If you've ever felt (dis)satisfied after accomplishing something, you might have asked this question - struggling to know or imagine the potential or effects of your success. However, you may have posed the question, then, quickly, ignored it. However, if you continue, you're going to find it difficult to ignore it, anymore. 

('Still time to be ignorant.)

So, to fully realize what "and, then, what !?" really means, or the e/a-ffects of it, you'll have to keep asking that question after EVERY "conclusion". 

Here are some (or THE) examples:
  - go to school (then what ?)
  - get a job (then what ?)
  - be wealthy (then what ?)
  - have no worries (then what ?)
  - have a family (then what?)
  - usher in the next generation (TW ?)
  - have grand children (TW ?)
  - save the world (TW ?) 
(let's say you believe in an after-corporeal-life)
  - (fast-tracked) live with God (TW?)
  - TW ???

all that to live with God ? Why not just suicide and expressway yourself to god ? But... Even so.... TW ??


Question 2: "What's the point !?"

If you've ever been forced to do something you didn't understand or found futility in certain actions, you might have asked this question. 

Since you've "G'ed it out" with question one, I'll get straight to it (irony joke).

Examples:
  - what's the point of an education if you learn what you need while you're "accomplishing" the task ?
  - what's the point of being successful if many "insuccessful" people live through 90yo ?
  - what's the point of being good if you're, still, hated by certain people or, still, get an incurable disease ?
  - what's the point of trying to improve the world if most or no one agrees ?
  - what's the point of being happy if you're, still, going to die ?
  - what's the point of learning new information if you're, still, going to die ?
  - what's the point of teaching if you're students are, still, going to die ?
  - what's the point of life if the result is death ?

When you realize the universe existed long before the abstract-understanding-of-life began, and will continue to exist long after the extinction of the abstract-understanding-of-life, you'll come to the conclusion, that, all value applied by humans is "worthless" - that, there IS no point. 

If Flatland's Model Is Correct...

Visualizing the First ' Second ' Third ' and (hinting at) the Forth dimensions, Flatland (story) describes an existence, where, all the dimensions interact with each other (however limited). If this expression is believed, then, would it be too farfetched to imagine the 3Dness in the universe is the 4th dimension seeping into our 3D "plane" ?

Would it be soo difficult to imagine a galaxy or nebula as, simply, the fragments of a 4D thing "bleeding" through ?

The theory would be, the cluster of things we see, in space, is, actually, part of a larger thing we CAN'T see... And, only, bits of it can penetrate the 3rd dimension, but, because it's one thing, it has to stay together, like a nebula or galaxy. 

Maybe the galaxies ' nebulas ' rogue objects are, even, all, 4D biological cells (???)

Beyond The 3rd Dimension

Is it possible we, already, think beyond the 3rd dimension (excluding the assumption/claim of Time being the 4th) ? 

When designing electronic components and chips and mapping out linkage, it is, often, tackled in a way that goes beyond X ' Y ' and Z - there are layers ' loops ' and metadata. None of those things are actions (therefore, cannot be considered as Time). Some of these processes and designs are mapped in a cluster or ideas paralleled by another cluster of ideas. Imagine a unique ' inperfect ' glass sphere, with trapped bubbles; then, imagine a second unique ' inperfect ' glass sphere, with trapped bubbles; now, imagine they're both ghosts and they move into each other's occupational-space; this is how the parallel clusters of ideas would be like.

So, when loops ' layers ' and two clusters occuping the same location exists, is it inpossible to consider the 4th dimension existing within our "grasp" ?

Very-often, I've had the need to map things out in an inconventional way, where, standard methods are too primative and things like "above the page", "next to the page", "nowhere near the page", and "within the words" are needed. Some examples expressing the evident-need resides in the use of hyperlinks ' super/sub-script links ' and encrypted text {(in)obviously}. (However, being without coding skills, I've had to find ways of "fudging it" to have everything fit inside the page. Though, i HAVE used Post-Its.)

Now, aside from mapping and designing, the concept of emotions presents the same clusterfuck of dimensions -- provoking the thought of the 4th dimension being something we're, already, in. 

And, being, that, the first and second dimensions are, technically, not accessible to our five main senses, this fourth dimension could, easily, fit right in. So... In abstract-theory, it seems reasonable for our current-reality to contain the fourth dimension and for us to be maneuvering it, already.